Is Amplemarket the right fit for your outbound team? It’s an all-in-one platform that helps sales teams automate lead generation, personalize messaging, and stay aligned with the buyer journey.
For some sales teams, that’s exactly what they need. But Amplemarket isn’t the only option. In this post, we’ll walk through four strong Amplemarket alternatives to compare.
Amplemarket alternatives overview
| Amplemarket alternatives | Best for | Top feature | Free trial? | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PhantomBuster | Sales prospecting automation | Real-time lead sourcing from LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, and Google Maps | Yes | $56/month |
| Cognism | Phone-verified B2B contact data | Diamond Data® with manual phone verification | Demo only | Custom |
| Lusha | Simple, affordable lead list building | Easy-to-use Chrome extension for instant data | Yes | $14.95/month |
| Apollo.io | High-volume outreach with enrichment | 210M+ contact database with built-in cadences | Yes | $49/month |
- Top pick: PhantomBuster for fast, flexible prospecting with real-time data. It’s perfect for teams who want to build lead lists quickly without the complexity of a full sales platform.
What is Amplemarket?
Amplemarket positions itself as a sales AI copilot. It combines lead generation, multichannel sales outreach, and workflow automation into a single platform. It’s built around AI and human collaboration, automating the grunt work while keeping people in control.
What Amplemarket is good for
Amplemarket combines lead sourcing, multichannel outreach, and reporting in one platform. Here are its top features.
- Sales intelligence platform: Amplemarket includes tools like Duo Copilot, a built-in AI sales assistant. It also offers Duo Copywriter to personalize outreach, as well as Duo Inbox for drafting email replies.
- Data and lead generation: Amplemarket pulls in contact details from a B2B database, along with intent signals and email verification. There’s also social prospecting and data enrichment using intent data and recent activity to prioritize accounts likely to engage.
- Multichannel engagement: With Amplemarket, you can build multichannel sequences across email, LinkedIn, and calls. Plus, there are tools for social automation, analytics, and intent-based outreach.
Amplemarket covers sourcing, outreach, and analytics in one interface, enhanced by AI.
However, it’s not always the best choice. Starting at $600/month, pricing may be out of range for smaller teams. And with some users reporting CRM sync issues and limited customer data, it can limit reach in niche industries.
Here’s why some sales reps eventually look elsewhere.
Amplemarket limitations: Why look for an alternative?
Here are some key limitations of Amplemarket, drawn from user reviews.
| Limitation: | Explanation: | Review: |
|---|---|---|
| Steep learning curve | New users often need time to learn the platform and get the most from its features. | “It takes a little time to fully utilize and master.” Sachin B., G2 |
| Limited data accuracy | Some contact data may be outdated or missing, affecting outreach quality. | “Not all data is available or accurate.” Alexandra G., G2 |
| Messy CRM integration | Some users report difficulties with Salesforce syncing, affecting communication between teams. | “There’s no way to mark a contact in Salesforce as ‘in sequence’.” Erica T., G2 |
| Limited industry coverage | Smaller or niche industries may struggle to find relevant leads in Amplemarket’s contact database. | “The database of customers… is quite narrow for my area of business (surveillance).” Jermaine C., G2 |
| Pricing structure | With prices starting at $600/month, some users feel the tool is overly expensive. | “The cost of using the tool can be high.” William V., G2 |
| Vague error messages | Error messages can be generic or unclear, making troubleshooting frustrating. | Some G2 reviewers cite unclear error messages that leave users guessing. |
| Manual workarounds needed | Leads often need to be manually added to sequences from LinkedIn or exported lists. | “I find it difficult to add a lead directly into a sequence via Amplemarket.” Pedro G., G2 |
4 best Amplemarket alternatives and competitors for lead generation
1. PhantomBuster: the best Amplemarket alternative for LinkedIn-first, no-code automation
While Amplemarket starts at $600/month, PhantomBuster is a sales prospecting automation platform starting at $56/month. Instead of relying on a static B2B contact database, it collects live lead data from LinkedIn and Sales Navigator using responsible automation, then enriches details for accuracy.
G2 rating: 4.4/5 (as of October 2025)
Capterra rating: 4.5/5 (as of October 2025)
PhantomBuster runs on schedules and triggers in the cloud, so your workflows execute automatically without manual effort. Track buying signals like profile views or LinkedIn engagement, and run social media outreach sequences.
PhantomBuster offers 100+ pre-built automations you can chain into a single workflow, from finding leads to enriching and syncing them. This gives you plenty of flexibility, without the learning curve of a full sales engagement platform like Amplemarket.
After capture, PhantomBuster’s AI-powered enrichment adds job changes, emails, and phone numbers so records are outreach-ready. Then, send enriched data straight to your CRM or a Google Sheet. With native integrations for HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive, plus Google Sheets export, PhantomBuster fits into your stack. No manual CSV juggling.
Why people switch from Amplemarket to PhantomBuster
With Amplemarket, some sales reps struggled to find verified contact data. On G2, Alexandra G. commented, “Not all data is available or accurate,” while Jermaine C. described the B2B contact database as “Narrow for my area of business.”
Unlike Amplemarket, PhantomBuster gives fresh data from LinkedIn and other live sources, so you’re not stuck relying on a static B2B database. It keeps things simple. It’s far more affordable, easier to get started with, and doesn’t lock you into a rigid workflow.
Plus, you can still enjoy AI-powered message personalization, with tools like the AI LinkedIn Message Writer to generate messages that resonate.
Some Amplemarket users also found the CRM sync limiting. “There’s no way to mark a contact in Salesforce as ‘in sequence,'” Erica T. noted on G2, which can create confusion between marketing and sales.
PhantomBuster integrates smoothly when it’s time to move that data into your CRM. With native integrations for HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive, plus Google Sheets export, it’s easy to fit into your existing stack.
How PhantomBuster differs from Amplemarket
PhantomBuster stands out for teams that want flexible, real-time sales tools without the high price tag or complexity of a full sales platform. Here’s how it works.
Step 1: Find and capture leads from LinkedIn and Sales Navigator. PhantomBuster extracts up-to-date lead details from LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, and other sources using responsible automation. You can target prospects by job title, company size, LinkedIn activity, and more.
Step 2: Enrich automatically with emails, phone numbers, and job changes. After capture, PhantomBuster’s AI-powered enrichment adds contact details and buying signals so records are outreach-ready. This means fewer bounced emails and more accurate lead lists.
Step 3: Sync to CRM and trigger personalized outreach with AI. Push enriched data (emails, job titles, phone numbers) into your CRM or Google Sheets with native integrations for HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive. Then use AI-powered message personalization to generate connection requests and follow-ups that convert.
PhantomBuster key features
- Real-time lead sourcing from LinkedIn and beyond: PhantomBuster extracts up-to-date lead details from LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, and Google Maps using responsible automation.
- Pricing: PhantomBuster starts at $56/month, compared to Amplemarket’s $600/month entry plan.
- Pre-built automations you can chain together: Use PhantomBuster’s 100+ ready-made automations together to find, enrich, and sync leads in one workflow. No complex platform setup.
- Native CRM integrations: Easily push enriched data into your CRM or Google Sheets with native integrations for HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive.
- Trigger-based prospecting: Monitor buying signals (profile visits or post engagement) and act on them automatically.
If you’re looking for a lighter, faster alternative to Amplemarket (especially one that finds leads from LinkedIn), then PhantomBuster is hard to beat.
Pros and cons of PhantomBuster
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Live, up-to-date data from platforms like LinkedIn and Sales Navigator | Works for one-off exports and ongoing automations; you’ll get most value by scheduling workflows |
| Affordable pricing compared to full-stack platforms like Amplemarket | Follow platform rate limits and best practices; PhantomBuster includes safe defaults to help you comply |
| Easy to set up with 100+ pre-built automations | Built for no-code teams, with flexible configuration for power users (filters, chaining automations) |
| Strong CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive) | |
| Great for continuous, trigger-based prospecting workflows |
Pricing plans: Amplemarket vs PhantomBuster
| Plan level | Amplemarket | PhantomBuster |
|---|---|---|
| Starter/Free | Free trial available if you book a live demo | A 14-day free trial is available |
| Standard | Startup ($600/month) Up to 30,000 contacts, 2 user seats, and community onboarding | Starter ($56/month) 20 hours of execution time, 10,000 AI credits, and 500 email credits (enough to run daily prospecting workflows) |
| Professional | Growth (Custom) Up to 280,000 contacts, 4 user seats, and personalized onboarding | Pro ($128/month) 80 hours of execution time, 30,000 AI credits, and 2,500 email credits |
| Enterprise | Elite (Custom) Up to 1 million contacts, 10 user seats, and all AI features | Team ($352/month) 300 hours of execution time, 90,000 AI credits, and 10,000 email credits |
Note: This pricing information is for annual contract holders.
Amplemarket vs PhantomBuster
If you want a single platform for outreach and reporting, Amplemarket can suit structured teams with time to onboard. But if you care more about live data, flexibility, and quick automation across LinkedIn and other platforms, PhantomBuster is often the sharper, leaner option. You won’t pay for features you don’t use.
When to choose PhantomBuster over Amplemarket
- You need a prospecting automation platform to remove repetitive tasks
- You want fresh data from LinkedIn and Google Maps without juggling multiple tools
- You’re looking for simple, pre-built automations you can launch in minutes
- You need predictable, low-cost pricing that still delivers qualified leads
- You don’t have time for complex data enrichment. You just want to build a quick lead list
2. Cognism
For teams prioritizing direct calls, Cognism is a strong alternative. While Amplemarket focuses on multichannel workflows and AI-generated content, Cognism zeroes in on accurate contact data, especially direct dials.
G2 rating: 4.6/5 (as of October 2025)
Capterra rating: 4.7/5 (as of October 2025)
Many users appreciate Cognism’s Diamond Data®, which includes phone numbers that are manually verified for accuracy. That means fewer wasted dials and more time talking to prospects.
And with built-in intent signals and integrations with tools like HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive, it fits neatly into most B2B workflows.
Cognism key features
- Phone-verified data (Diamond Data®): Sales teams that rely on calling get more direct dials and fewer wrong numbers.
- Intent and trigger signals: Combine job changes, funding rounds, and Bombora-powered intent data to find your ideal prospects.
- GDPR-compliant contact lists: Cognism is fully aligned with GDPR, CCPA, and SOC 2, and it automatically checks contacts against international do-not-call lists.
- CRM-ready exports: With Cognism, you can easily push enriched data into Salesforce, HubSpot, or Pipedrive without juggling multiple tools.
Pros and cons of Cognism
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Phone-verified numbers to reduce wrong dials (Diamond Data®) | Pricing can be high for startups or small teams |
| Includes intent signals and trigger events (job changes, funding rounds) | Occasional outdated or missing data entries, according to some reviewers |
| GDPR, CCPA, and SOC 2 compliant with automatic do-not-call filtering | Less focused on LinkedIn-first workflows than PhantomBuster |
Pricing plans: Amplemarket vs Cognism
| Plan level | Amplemarket | Cognism |
|---|---|---|
| Starter/Free | Free trial available if you book a live demo | None, but you can book a free demo |
| Standard | Startup ($600/month) Up to 30,000 contacts, 2 user seats, and community onboarding | Grow (Custom) Demographic data, firmographic data, and 250 contacts per list |
| Professional | Growth (Custom) Up to 280,000 contacts, 4 user seats, and personalized onboarding | Elevate (Custom) Everything in Grow, plus signals data, 500 contacts per list, and bonus add-ons |
| Enterprise | Elite (Custom) Up to 1 million contacts, 10 user seats, and all AI features | N/A |
Note: This pricing information is for annual contract holders.
Amplemarket vs Cognism
Amplemarket is built for multichannel engagement with automation baked in. Cognism, on the other hand, is all about data quality, especially if phone outreach is your main focus. If you need clean, compliant contact info with strong intent signals, Cognism delivers. Just be prepared to pay more, especially if you’re a smaller team.
When to choose Cognism over Amplemarket
- You need high-quality phone numbers for outbound calling
- You want GDPR-compliant data with verified opt-out filtering
- Your team depends on timely buying signals to prioritize outreach
- You’re in a regulated industry or a region where compliance matters
- You’re tired of high bounce rates and want fewer manual verifications
3. Lusha
One of the biggest reasons sales teams move from Amplemarket to Lusha comes down to simplicity. While Amplemarket offers a comprehensive platform with automation and AI features, Lusha focuses on what many teams care about most: quick access to accurate B2B contact data.
G2 rating: 4.3/5 (as of October 2025)
Capterra rating: 4/5 (as of October 2025)
Lusha is often easier to set up and use right away, without the learning curve that comes with a more complex sales engagement platform.
And for teams that spend most of their time prospecting on LinkedIn, having a Chrome extension that delivers instant phone numbers and emails helps reps reach decision-makers faster.
Lusha key features
- Easy-to-use Chrome extension: Instantly grab verified contact info while browsing LinkedIn or company websites.
- Affordable for small teams: Lower-cost plans make it accessible for solo reps, startups, and growing teams that don’t need a full suite of sales engagement tools.
- Verified direct dials and emails: Focuses on quality B2B contact data, including direct dials and work emails.
- Flexible data export: Quickly export lead lists to your CRM or download them as a CSV.
Pros and cons of Lusha
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Easy to use, especially via its Chrome extension | Less suited for multichannel outreach workflows |
| Affordable pricing for smaller teams | Limited automation features compared to PhantomBuster |
| Good coverage of direct dials and emails | Data quality is sometimes inaccurate |
Pricing plans: Amplemarket vs Lusha
| Plan level | Amplemarket | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Starter/Free | Free trial available if you book a live demo | Free plan Access a credit-based system with phone numbers, emails, intent signals, and a Chrome extension |
| Standard | Startup ($600/month) Up to 30,000 contacts, 2 user seats, and community onboarding | Pro ($14.95/month) 3,000 credits, 3 user seats, basic usage analytics, and intent signal alerts |
| Professional | Growth (Custom) Up to 280,000 contacts, 4 user seats, and personalized onboarding | Premium ($52.45/month) 9,600 credits, 5 user seats, advanced usage analytics, and bonus intent signal alerts |
| Enterprise | Elite (Custom) Up to 1 million contacts, 10 user seats, and all AI features | Custom (On request) Tailored solution, with free manager seat and more advanced intent signals, plus CRM enrichment |
Note: This pricing information is for annual contract holders.
Amplemarket vs Lusha
If you need a full suite of sales engagement tools, then Amplemarket may be the better fit. But if your top priority is building clean, accurate prospect lists, Lusha often wins out. It’s also a great fit for teams with smaller budgets who still want to level up their prospect engagement strategy.
When to choose Lusha over Amplemarket
- You don’t need multichannel sequences or AI-powered writing tools
- You’re a small team (or solo) looking for affordable B2B leads
- You prefer simplicity over feature-packed complexity
- You just need reliable phone numbers and work emails, nothing more, nothing less
- You’d rather pay for the data you use than commit to an expensive sales platform
4. Apollo.io
Apollo.io appeals to sales teams that want a large contact database combined with built-in outreach tools. Compared to Amplemarket, which emphasizes AI writing and buyer journey alignment, Apollo.io puts its focus on data volume and advanced search filters.
G2 rating: 4.7/5 (as of October 2025)
Capterra rating: 4.6/5 (as of October 2025)
Apollo.io reports 210M+ contacts and 35M companies (as of October 2025), making it easy to pull lead lists fast, segment by dozens of criteria, and kick off multi-step sequences.
Considerations: Some users report issues with data accuracy, as well as occasional CRM syncing headaches.
Others mention that some users report being asked to share CRM data on lower-priced plans, so review terms before enabling.
Apollo.io key features
- 210M+ contacts with 65+ filters: Access 210 million contacts and 35 million companies, with 65+ search filters.
- Built-in outreach sequences: Run automated multi-step cadences across email, LinkedIn, and calls without needing a separate prospect engagement tool.
- Data enrichment: Maintain CRM hygiene with up-to-date contact details, including direct dials and LinkedIn URLs.
- AI-powered sales call analysis: Get conversation insights, sentiment analysis, and coaching recommendations to improve your messaging.
Pros and cons of Apollo.io
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Large contact database with advanced search filters | Privacy concerns if opting into CRM data sharing on lower plans |
| Built-in multi-step cadences (email, LinkedIn, calls) | Some users feel support is more focused on upselling |
| AI call analysis and engagement scoring | Data accuracy can be mixed, with some bounced emails and wrong numbers |
Pricing plans: Amplemarket vs Apollo.io
| Plan level | Amplemarket | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Starter/Free | Free trial available if you book a live demo | Free plan Includes 1,200 credits per user/year, plus 2 sequences and basic filters |
| Standard | Startup ($600/month) Up to 30,000 contacts, 2 user seats, and community onboarding | Basic ($49/month) 60,000 credits per user/year, plus advanced filters, CRM integrations, and intent data |
| Professional | Growth (Custom) Up to 280,000 contacts, 4 user seats, and personalized onboarding | Professional ($79/month) 120,000 credits per user/year, unlimited sequences, US dialer, automated workflows, and more |
| Enterprise | Elite (Custom) Up to 1 million contacts, 10 user seats, and all AI features | Organization ($119/month) 180,000 credits per user/year, customizable reports and dashboards, advanced security, and more |
Note: This pricing information is for annual contract holders.
Amplemarket vs Apollo.io
Amplemarket leans into AI-powered personalization and buyer journey mapping, while Apollo.io focuses on scale, offering one of the largest B2B contact databases with built-in outreach. If volume and speed are your top priorities, Apollo.io may fit the bill. But if you’re concerned about data accuracy and CRM privacy, you might look elsewhere.
When to choose Apollo.io over Amplemarket
- You want to pull large lead lists quickly and sort them with detailed filters
- You’re looking for a comprehensive solution for data, enrichment, and outreach
- You need automated cadences across email, calls, and LinkedIn in the same tool
- You’re willing to manage some manual cleanup or bounced contacts
- You want AI insights on sales calls to improve coaching and messaging
Amplemarket alternatives FAQs
Is Amplemarket good for lead generation?
Yes, Amplemarket offers solid lead generation features with automation and AI support, but it can feel complex or pricey for smaller teams, and the contact database may not suit every industry. It’s important to review Amplemarket alternatives to find the best fit for your team.
What’s the best alternative to Amplemarket for enhanced prospecting efforts?
It depends on your priorities. If you want automated sales prospecting, PhantomBuster is a straightforward, affordable choice. For verified phone numbers and compliance, Cognism stands out. If simplicity matters most, then Lusha is worth a look. And for high-volume outreach with built-in enrichment, Apollo.io is often a strong option.
Will PhantomBuster work with my CRM?
Yes. PhantomBuster integrates natively with HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive. You can also export data to Google Sheets or use API access for custom integrations.
How do you stay within LinkedIn rate limits?
PhantomBuster includes safe defaults to help you comply with platform rate limits. You can adjust execution speed, set daily limits, and schedule workflows to mimic human behavior. Follow best practices for responsible automation.
Does PhantomBuster replace my sequencing tool?
PhantomBuster handles lead sourcing, enrichment, and LinkedIn outreach sequences. For email sequencing, you can integrate with your existing email automation tool or CRM. Many teams use PhantomBuster to feed qualified leads into their email campaigns.
How accurate is the data?
PhantomBuster extracts live data from LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, then enriches it with AI-powered tools. This means you get up-to-date contact details, job titles, and company information. Data accuracy depends on the source, but real-time sourcing reduces outdated records compared to static databases.